128th session of the Council of Competition was held in Sarajevo on 19th April 2016 with the following adopted:
Decision rejecting Request of undertaking Hifa d.o.o. Tešanj filed against undertakings Institute for Quality Testing d.o.o. Mostar, Herkon d.o.o. Mostar, Sistem Qualita’s Pale, Euro-Inspekt RGH d.o.o. Sarajevo and SiM Control d.o.o. Bijeljina, relating to assessment of legality of Decision on increase in the prices of monitoring the quality of liquid petroleum products No: SAO-482/8 from 22nd May, in accordance with Article 4, Paragraph 2, Items a) and b) of the Competition Act.
Decision rejecting Request of undertaking ” Elektrokontakt SA” d.o.o., against undertaking Public Enterprise ”Elektroprivreda BiH” d.d. Sarajevo subsidiary ”Eldis-tehnika” d.o.o. Sarajevo, in order to determine the abuse of dominant position, in accordance with Article 10, Paragraph (2), Items a) and b) of Competition Act, as unfounded.
Decision rejecting Request for temporary measures of Association of Cable Operators in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajevo and undertaking Public Enterprise ”Hrvatske telekomunikacije” d.d. Mostar, against undertaking ”United Media” S.a.r.l. Luxembourg, undertaking ”Sport Klub” d.o.o. Sarajevo and Telemach group.
Conclusion extending the deadline for Decision for additional 3 (three) months in the proceedings before Council of Competition upon Conclusion on initiating the proceedings from 27th January 2016, initiated ex officio in order to assess the concentration on the basis of joint venture of undertakings Bingo d.o.o. Tuzla, Menprom d.o.o. Tuzla in accordance with Articles 16 and 18 of Competition Act.
Conclusion suspending the proceedings for assessment of concentration of undertakings Allergan Plc, Dublin, Ireland and Pfizer Inc. New York, the USA, initiated by Conclusion established by Council of Competition No: 06-26-1-043-16-II/15 from 7th July 2016.
Conclusion rejecting the Notification of concentration of legal entities Branislav Vujović, Vienna, Austria and Dejan Popović, Vienna, Austria because they did not fulfil the conditions for Notification of concentration in terms of Article 14, Paragraph (1) of Competition Act.
Opinion upon request for an opinion on the existence of prohibited agreement in terms of violation of Article 4, Paragraph (1), Items b),c) and e) of Competition Act.