The eleventh session of the Competition Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina was held in Sarajevo on 11 October 2017, with the following adopted:

Conclusion rejecting the Claim for initiation of the proceedings of the Sarajevo Canton Tourist Board, against the Sarajevo Canton Assembly, in order to determine the prohibited competitive activity within the meaning of Article 4, paragraph (1), point b) of the Law on Competition, due to lack of actual competence.
Conclusion on rejection of the notification of a concentration of undertakings Mješoviti Holding “Elektroprivreda Republike Srpske” Parent company a.d. Trebinje, and Public Enterprise “Elektroprivreda Hrvatske zajednice Herceg-Bosne” d.d. Mostar, for lack of concentration, within the meaning of Article 12 of the Law on Competition.
Conclusion on the initiation of proceedings at the Claim for initiation of proceedings of the undertaking “Telemach” d.o.o. Sarajevo against the undertaking “BH Telecom” d.d. Sarajevo, in order to determine the abuse of a dominant position within the meaning of Article 10, paragraph (2) of the Law on Competition.
Conclusion that initiated the proceedings at the Claim filed by the undertaking “Telemach” d.o.o. Sarajevo against BH Telecom d.d. Sarajevo for the purpose of determining the abuse of a dominant position within the meaning of Article 10, paragraph (2), point b) of the Law on Competition, on market of the wholesale physical access to the network infrastructure of BH Telecom.
Conclusion on the initiation of proceedings at the Claim for initiation of proceedings filed by the undertaking Telemach d.o.o. Sarajevo, against the undertaking BH Telecom d.d. Sarajevo, in order to determine the abuse of the dominant position referred to in Article 10 paragraph (2) of the Law on Competition and Article 9 paragraph (1) points a), b), c), e) and g) of the Decision on defining the dominant position category.
Conclusion on the initiation of the proceedings at the Claim of the undertaking Hering d.d. Široki Brijeg, filed on 10.07.2017. against the Public Enterprise of the Motorway of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina d.o.o. Mostar, in order to determine the existence of an infringement under Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Law on Competition.
Conclusion on the initiation of the proceedings at the Claim of the undertaking Ekopak – Packaging Waste Management Company d.o.o. Sarajevo, against the Federal Ministry of Environment and Tourism, for issuance of the Rule-book on Amendments to the Rule-book on Packaging and Waste Management (“Official Gazette of FBiH” No. 103/16), within the meaning of Article 4, paragraph 1, b), d) ) of the Law on Competition.

Conclusion on the rejection of the notification of the concentration of the undertaking Phoenix Parent Holdings Inc. c / o Maples Fiduciary Services (Delaware) Inc., Delaware, 19808, United States, for the lack of the obligation to notify a concentration within the meaning of Article 14, paragraph (1) of the Law on competition.
Opinion at the request of the undertaking Bingo d.o.o., Tuzla, regarding the existence of the obligation to file a notification of a concentration.
Opinion at the request of the undertaking Bingo d.o.o., Tuzla, regarding the existence of the obligation to file a notification of a concentration.

Opinion according to which the Regulation on the manner of use, order and operation in taxi locations, the arrangement of taxi vehicles on taxi positions and the criteria for the arrangement of taxi vehicles in taxi positions in the area of the City of Zenica is not harmonized with the Law on Competition.
President
Ivo Jerkić