PRESS RELEASE – 132nd SESSION OF THE COMPETITION COUNCIL OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
132nd session of the Competition Council was held in Sarajevo on 15 September with the following adopted:
Decision establishing that the undertakings “Radio – Television of Bosnia and Herzegovina”, “Radio – Television of the Republic of Srpska” and “Radio – Television of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina”, in accordance with Article 11 paragraph (2) of the Law on Competition, do not abuse dominant position within the meaning of Article 10 paragraph (2) items a), c) and d) of the Law.
Conclusion which extended the deadline for the final decision for an additional 3 (three) months in the proceedings pending before the Competition Council of the Conclusion for initiation of proceedings upon request of Bosmekni Trans d.o.o. Zenica to determine the existence of prohibited competition activities within the meaning of Article 4 parahraph (1), points b), c) and d) and Article 10 of the Law on Competition.
Conclusion rejecting the Notification of concentration of natural persons Raif Colic and Ekrem Hanic, establishing an undertaking “AREX GROUP” d.o.o. for production, trade and services, Brcko District, for the lack of concentration within the meaning of the Law on Competition.
Conclusion rejecting Notification of concentration of undertaking “MG Mind” d.o.o. Mrkonjic Grad for the lack of obligation to notify.
Conclusion for initiation of proceedings upon the Claim of the undertaking Krka Farma d.o.o. Sarajevo, and Krka Pharmaceuticals, d.d., Novo Mesto, Slovenia against the Government of Sarajevo Canton to determine the existence of prohibited competition activities within the meaning of Article 4 paragraph (1), point b) of the Law on Competition.
Conclusion to initiate proceedings upon the Claim of the “ORTHO LIFE” d.o.o. Bihac against Health Insurance Institute of Una-Sana Canton Bihac in order to establish abuse of a dominant position under Article 10 paragraph (2), b) and c) and the existence of an agreement prohibited by Article 4 (1), item b), c) and d) of the Law on competition.
Opinion upon the Claim of Swisslion Group Ltd. Novi Sad, Serbia, for an opinion of the Competition Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina on the existence of the obligation to notify the concentration.
Opinion on the Claim for an opinion of the undertaking Ekopak d.o.o. Sarajevo on the existence of the obligation to notify the concentration within the meaning of the Law on Competition, submitted by a lawyer Samir Čengić from Sarajevo.
Opinion on the Claim for an opinion of the undertaking Oracle BH d.o.o., Sarajevo, on the protection of competition in the IT sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Competition Council